<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bob Bendat &#187; Yorba Linda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bobbendat.com/category/yorba-linda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bobbendat.com</link>
	<description>Orange County Realtor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:55:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Protect Real Estate From Medicaid!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/12/protect-real-estate-from-medicaid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/12/protect-real-estate-from-medicaid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bendat, PSC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bob Bendat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Team Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yorba Linda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbendat.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DEAR BENNY: Seven years ago, when my mother was 80, my husband and I purchased cooperative apartment shares in a senior complex for her to live in. Since at least one of the tenants had to be over 55, we put her name on the shares, as well as my name. The actual paperwork reads: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>DEAR BENNY: Seven years ago, when my mother was 80</strong>, my husband and I<br />
purchased cooperative apartment shares in a senior complex for her to live in.<br />
Since at least one of the tenants had to be over 55, we put her name on the<br />
shares, as well as my name. The actual paperwork reads: &#8221; &#8216;My Mother&#8217;s Name&#8217; or<br />
&#8216;My Name&#8217; as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in<br />
common.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>If my mother needs to move to assisted living</strong> or a nursing home,<br />
will Medicaid try to get possession of this apartment? I&#8217;ve called the co-op&#8217;s<br />
attorney, senior law offices here in Reno, Nev., and I&#8217;ve called private<br />
attorneys. No one can give me an answer.</p>
<p><strong>One office suggested I call the Medicaid office</strong>. As much as I would like to, I think that might give Medicaid an<br />
opportunity to take what isn&#8217;t hers. We used equity in our home to purchase this<br />
apartment. My mom lives on Social Security and could never afford this<br />
apartment.</p>
<p><strong>One lawyer suggested the co-op &#8220;reconvey&#8221;</strong> the share back to my<br />
name, but their bylaws require that whoever is on the deed live<br />
there.</p>
<p>Any ideas? Are we safe in keeping this, selling it and keeping the<br />
monies, or will Medicaid take it? &#8211;Penny</em></p>
<p><strong>DEAR PENNY</strong>: This is a<br />
complicated question and I am surprised that the senior law offices were unable<br />
to assist. There are a number of &#8220;elder lawyers&#8221; throughout the country, and you<br />
can locate them on the Web. I searched &#8220;elder lawyers&#8221; and found a number of Web<br />
sites that should be of assistance to you.</p>
<p><strong>Generally, however, Medicaid (which is administered by the state, with each state having its own rules)</strong> does<br />
not &#8220;get possession&#8221; of property. But if your mother applies for Medicaid, I<br />
assume she will need to disclose her interest in the co-op as an<br />
asset.</p>
<p>It is possible that the state will take into account the fact that<br />
she is not an &#8220;equitable&#8221; owner of the property (as she did not contribute to<br />
the purchase price of the property) and simply disregard the asset. But even if<br />
she is considered to be an owner for Medicaid purposes, the state may impose<br />
only a lien on the property rather than require it be sold.</p>
<p>In fact, if the state considers the co-op interest an asset of your mother, it wouldn&#8217;t<br />
require her to sell it, but could deny her benefits until her assets, including<br />
her interest in the house, were spent down to whatever the threshold is in<br />
Nevada.</p>
<p>Many states allow a number of exceptions. For example, if a<br />
disabled family member (or a spouse, which I assume there is none) is living in<br />
the property, the Medicaid applicant would qualify for benefits and a lien would<br />
be imposed on the applicant&#8217;s share of the property in the amount of any<br />
benefits paid &#8212; but the benefits would need to be reimbursed when the property<br />
is sold or the disabled person or spouse dies.</p>
<p>This is a highly specialized area of law, and not all attorneys understand the rules or the law.</p>
<p><em><strong>DEAR BENNY</strong>: I have a question about escrows for taxes and<br />
insurance. Let&#8217;s say I am buying a home and last year&#8217;s tax bill was $1,200 (or<br />
$100 per month). Can the lender set up escrow collecting $150 per month for<br />
taxes? &#8211;Nate</em></p>
<p><strong>DEAR NATE</strong>: My mathematical skills are limited, but the<br />
answer to your question is no. According to the federal Real Estate Settlement<br />
Procedures Act (commonly known as RESPA), a lender who collects money in escrow<br />
for real estate taxes and insurance can have only a two months&#8217; cushion on an<br />
annual basis.</p>
<p>So, if the bank is collecting $150 per month, annually that<br />
comes to $1,800. A two-month cushion allows you to collect only $1,400, or<br />
$116.66 per month.</p>
<p>But depending on when settlement takes place, the<br />
lender does have the right to collect sufficient funds (plus two months extra)<br />
to make sure that it can pay the taxes and insurance when they become<br />
due.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take this example: You settle (go to escrow) on May 15. The<br />
tax bill in your jurisdiction must be paid by Sept. 30, 2010, but is applied<br />
from January 2010 through December 2010. Because mortgage interest is calculated<br />
in arrears, your first payment will due in July. (Note: The lender will charge<br />
you interest at closing from May 15 to the end of that month.)</p>
<p>By the time the real estate tax bill has to be paid, you will have made three payments<br />
in escrow (July, August and September). But the lender needs a full 12-month<br />
payment. Accordingly, the lender has the right to charge you &#8212; at closing &#8211;<br />
nine months&#8217; escrow to collect all the money needed, plus two months&#8217; cushion;<br />
in other words, the lender can charge you at closing for 11 months&#8217;<br />
escrow.</p>
<p><strong>Here&#8217;s a consumer protection suggestion</strong>: Because too many lenders<br />
often do not make the tax or insurance payments on a timely basis &#8212; or in some<br />
cases do not make the payments at all &#8212; homeowners should send their lender a<br />
demand letter, once a year right after the taxes or insurance payments are due,<br />
requesting proof that those payments have, in fact, been made.</p>
<p>For those<br />
jurisdictions where this information can be found online, you should learn how<br />
to access this from your local government&#8217;s Web site.</p>
<p><em><strong>Benny L. Kass is<br />
a practicing attorney in Washington, D.C., and Maryland. No legal relationship<br />
is created by this column.</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/12/protect-real-estate-from-medicaid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Making an Offer and Buying a House&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/12/making-an-offer-and-buying-a-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/12/making-an-offer-and-buying-a-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bendat, PSC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bob Bendat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Team Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yorba Linda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbendat.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After mustering the emotional energy to make an offer on a listing, it can be devastating if you hear nothing back from the seller. In most cases, if the offer isn&#8217;t what the sellers are looking for, they will issue a counteroffer detailing the price and terms they can live with. When a seller doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>After mustering the emotional energy to make an offer on a listing</strong>, it can be devastating if you hear nothing back from the seller. In most cases, if the offer isn&#8217;t what the sellers are looking for, they will issue a counteroffer detailing the price and terms they can live with. When a seller doesn&#8217;t respond at all to your offer, it&#8217;s usually because the offer is so low that the seller thinks it&#8217;s a waste of everyone&#8217;s time. Ask your agent to talk to the listing agent to find out why the seller didn&#8217;t counter your offer. Then, make another offer if you think the house warrants a higher price. If the sellers want too much for their house, take a breather. Let the listing sit on the market awhile before you make another offer. The risk of this approach is that another buyer could come into the picture who is willing to pay the sellers&#8217; price. Nothing is lost if you wouldn&#8217;t have paid that price. Your agent should keep in touch with the listing agent during your wait-and-see period. Ideally, you&#8217;d like to know if the sellers are going to reduce the price before it shows up on the multiple listing service. A price reduction to market value could elicit interest from multiple buyers.<br />
<strong>Risk-averse sellers</strong> can be skittish about working with buyers who have a low cash downpayment. It&#8217;s wise to include a mortgage preapproval letter with your offer. Also, some sellers aren&#8217;t in a position to accept an offer that&#8217;s contingent on the sale of the buyers&#8217; home. Another reason buyers don&#8217;t receive counteroffers is because there were multiple offers. The sellers can accept only one offer in primary position. If there were five offers and yours was the lowest, you&#8217;re not likely to receive a counteroffer. Multiple offers are occurring in low-inventory, high-demand<br />
markets. Buyers were out early this year due to lower home prices, low interest rates and homebuyer tax credits.<br />
<strong>HOUSE HUNTING</strong>: A typical reaction from buyers who lose in a multiple-offer competition is that they would have paid more. When you&#8217;re competing against other buyers, you need to make your first offer your best offer. This seems counterintuitive because you run the risk of<br />
paying more than you might need to. One way to ensure that you don&#8217;t pay too much is to include an appraisal contingency in your purchase offer. Generally, an appraisal contingency allows the buyers to withdraw from the contract if the house doesn&#8217;t appraise for the purchase price. In today&#8217;s wary lending environment, lenders are requiring appraisers to be conservative on appraisals, particularly in declining markets.<br />
Be aware that some buyers in a competitive situation will not include an appraisal contingency in their contract. If they have a large enough cash downpayment and the appraisal value is less that the contract price, the lender may still approve a loan amount that will enable to the buyer to proceed with the sale.<br />
<strong>THE CLOSING</strong>: Buyers who want a house badly enough will often pay more than the appraised value if they have enough cash to make up the shortfall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/12/making-an-offer-and-buying-a-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Barclays analyst sees housing rebound coming in 2012&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/12/barclays-analyst-sees-housing-rebound-coming-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/12/barclays-analyst-sees-housing-rebound-coming-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bendat, PSC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bob Bendat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Team Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Market News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yorba Linda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbendat.com/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by KERRI PANCHUK &#160; Toll and Lennar shares see action in builder sector Lennar looks to distressed debt as homebuilding slump persists Survey finds house prices still stable in August as buyer interest hits &#8216;brick wall&#8217; S&#38;P lowers Toll Brothers rating to junk DR Horton Returns to Profit &#160; &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="newsAuthor">by KERRI PANCHUK</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="newsLeft"><!-- Story Highlights<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------><!-- Related Stories<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------></p>
<div id="relatedStories">
<div id="bhRelatedStories"><img src="http://www.housingwire.com/wp-content/themes/default/images/bh_relatedstories.png" alt="" width="200" height="30" /></div>
<ul>
<li><a title="January 14, 2010" href="http://www.housingwire.com/2010/01/14/toll-and-lennar-shares-see-action-in-builder-sector" rel="bookmark">Toll and Lennar shares see action in builder sector</a></li>
<li><a title="March 22, 2010" href="http://www.housingwire.com/2010/03/22/lennar-looks-to-distressed-debt-as-homebuilding-slump-persists" rel="bookmark">Lennar looks to distressed debt as homebuilding slump persists</a></li>
<li><a title="September 20, 2010" href="http://www.housingwire.com/2010/09/20/survey-finds-house-prices-still-stable-in-august-as-buyer-interest-hits-brick-wall" rel="bookmark">Survey finds house prices still stable in August as buyer interest<br />
hits &#8216;brick wall&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a title="June 28, 2011" href="http://www.housingwire.com/2011/06/28/sp-lowers-toll-brothers-credit-rating-to-junk" rel="bookmark">S&amp;P lowers Toll Brothers rating to junk</a></li>
<li><a title="February 2, 2010" href="http://www.housingwire.com/2010/02/02/dr-horton-returns-to-profit" rel="bookmark">DR Horton Returns to Profit</a></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="adConference"><!--/* OpenX Javascript Tag v2.8.4 */--><!--/*<br />
* The backup image section of this tag has been generated for use on a<br />
* non-SSL page. If this tag is to be placed on an SSL page, change the<br />
*   'http://hw.hw-ads.com/www/delivery/...'<br />
* to<br />
*   'https://hw.hw-ads.com/www/delivery/...'<br />
*<br />
* This noscript section of this tag only shows image banners. There<br />
* is no width or height in these banners, so if you want these tags to<br />
* allocate space for the ad before it shows, you will need to add this<br />
* information to the <img> tag.<br />
*<br />
* If you do not want to deal with the intricities of the noscript<br />
* section, delete the tag (from <noscript>&#8230; to </noscript>). On<br />
* average, the noscript tag is called from less than 1% of internet<br />
* users.<br />
*/&#8211;><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
//<![CDATA[
   var m3_u = (location.protocol=='https:'?'https://hw.hw-ads.com/www/delivery/ajs.php':'http://hw.hw-ads.com/www/delivery/ajs.php');
   var m3_r = Math.floor(Math.random()*99999999999);
   if (!document.MAX_used) document.MAX_used = ',';
   document.write ("<scr"+"ipt type='text/javascript' src='"+m3_u);
   document.write ("?zoneid=17");
   document.write ('&amp;cb=' + m3_r);
   if (document.MAX_used != ',') document.write ("&amp;exclude=" + document.MAX_used);
   document.write (document.charset ? '&amp;charset='+document.charset : (document.characterSet ? '&amp;charset='+document.characterSet : ''));
   document.write ("&amp;loc=" + escape(window.location));
   if (document.referrer) document.write ("&amp;referer=" + escape(document.referrer));
   if (document.context) document.write ("&#038;context=" + escape(document.context));
   if (document.mmm_fo) document.write ("&amp;mmm_fo=1");
   document.write ("'><\/scr"+"ipt>");
//]]&gt;
// ]]&gt;</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://hw.hw-ads.com/www/delivery/ajs.php?zoneid=17&amp;cb=79105548782&amp;charset=utf-8&amp;loc=http%3A//www.housingwire.com/2011/12/05/barclays-analyst-sees-housing-rebound-coming-in-2012%3Futm_source%3Dtwitterfeed%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter%26utm_campaign%3DFeed%253A+housingwire%252FuOVI+%2528HousingWire%2529&amp;referer=http%3A//www.housingwire.com/2011/12/05/barclays-analyst-sees-housing-rebound-coming-in-2012%3Futm_source%3Dtwitterfeed%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter%26utm_campaign%3DFeed%253A+housingwire%252FuOVI+%2528HousingWire%2529&amp;context=cDo0NDkjcDo0NTAjcDo0NTV8&amp;mmm_fo=1"></script><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
document.context='cDo0NDkjcDo0NTAjcDo0NTV8';
// ]]&gt;</script>Monday, December 5th, 2011</div>
</div>
<div id="newsRight">
<div id="newsText">
<p><strong>Barclays Capital</strong> (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BCS" target="_blank">BCS</a>: 11.20 <span style="color: #ff0000;">-6.90%</span>) analyst Stephen Kim predicts a housing recovery<br />
buoyed by improving jobs numbers and the fact prices for nondistressed homes<br />
will have stabilized without government support.</p>
<p>&#8220;In the absence of a government homebuyer incentives, prices for<br />
non-distressed home sales have stabilized for almost a year,&#8221; Kim said. &#8220;This is<br />
the most important trend in the housing industry right now, and we are amazed at<br />
how little attention it has been getting from the media and the street. This<br />
stability on the part of nondistressed prices has occurred despite a very high<br />
share of distressed activity and continued declines in overall prices.&#8221;</p>
<p>Barclays said recent economic data — including higher job creation in<br />
November, housing starts and improved homebuyer traffic — point to some<br />
improvement potential in the sector.</p>
<p>In mid-2010, the federal homebuyer tax credit expired, leaving the housing<br />
market without training wheels for the first time since the 2008 economic<br />
meltdown. Yet, prices in some housing markets remained stable on the back<br />
end.</p>
<p>With its new outlook in the market, Barclays upgraded <strong>D.R.<br />
Horton</strong>&#8216;s (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=DHI" target="_blank">DHI</a>: 12.23 <span style="color: #ff0000;">-3.62%</span>) stock to buy and raised price targets for D.R.<br />
Horton, <strong>Lennar</strong> (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=LEN" target="_blank">LEN</a>: 19.02 <span style="color: #ff0000;">-2.96%</span>), <strong>Toll Brothers</strong> (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TOL" target="_blank">TOL</a>: 20.39 <span style="color: #ff0000;">-2.58%</span>) and <strong>Meritage Homes</strong> (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MTH" target="_blank">MTH</a>: 22.39 <span style="color: #ff0000;">-3.20%</span>).</p>
<p>At the same time, the investment bank raised its 2012 earnings-per-share<br />
estimates for D.R. Horton, Lennar, Meritage Homes, <strong>Pulte</strong> (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=PHM" target="_blank">PHM</a>: 6.07 <span style="color: #ff0000;">-5.89%</span>) and Toll Brothers, while lowering its estimates for<br />
<strong>KB Home</strong> (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=KBH" target="_blank">KBH</a>: 7.89 <span style="color: #ff0000;">-3.43%</span>).</p>
<p>&#8220;Thus, the key to timing housing’s recovery depends primarily on when these<br />
first-time buyers decide it is safe to buy a house,&#8221; Kim concluded.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/12/barclays-analyst-sees-housing-rebound-coming-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Why should a seller go through the short sale process rather than letting their house be foreclosed upon?”</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/10/%e2%80%9cwhy-should-a-seller-go-through-the-short-sale-process-rather-than-letting-their-house-be-foreclosed-upon%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/10/%e2%80%9cwhy-should-a-seller-go-through-the-short-sale-process-rather-than-letting-their-house-be-foreclosed-upon%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bendat, PSC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bob Bendat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Team Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Market News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yorba Linda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delinquencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeowners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notice of default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notice of trustee sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sellers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbendat.com/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today’s ever changing real estate industry has brought upon some very challenging questions. I want to put forth the best, non-emotional advice that I can, in hopes that I can help families navigate the rough waters of the short sale process. The most prevalent question and one that continues to permeate the industry is: “Why should a seller [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s ever changing real estate industry has brought upon some very challenging questions. I want to put forth the best, non-emotional advice that I can, in hopes that I can help families navigate the rough waters of the short sale process.</p>
<p>The most prevalent question and one that continues to permeate the industry is:</p>
<p>“Why should a seller go through the short sale process rather than letting their house be foreclosed upon?”</p>
<p>While we cannot speak to every client circumstance, we can say one thing with complete conviction.  In almost all instances in which a potential seller is contemplating whether they should short sell their house or let it go through the foreclosure process, a short sale is the better option. The following are examples to consider:</p>
<p>Example A- Short Sale</p>
<p>Mr. Smith owns a home in which he has a mortgage balance of $220,000 and a current market value of $150,000. Mr. Smith has elected to short sell his property. His Realtor successfully obtains a buyer who puts forth an offer price of $120,000 (80% current market value according to Realty Trac Foreclosure Report 5/26/2011). After reviewing the buyers offer and the financial hardship information from Mr. Smith, Mr Smith’s bank agrees to accept the short payoff of $120,000 which would leave a deficiency balance of $100,000.</p>
<p>The transaction closes and is final.  Mr. Smith then pulls his credit report 30 days after the transaction takes place. On the report he notices that the mortgage trade line states “Mortgage debt was settled for less than full” and the balance on the mortgage is $0.  Mr. Smith is now on the road to financial recovery.</p>
<p>Example B- Foreclosure</p>
<p>For the ease of illustration we will use the same value and mortgage debt amounts as in Example A. However, Mr. Smith has elected to forgo the short sale process and let the bank foreclose on the property.  The bank holding his mortgage facilitates the proper legal procedures to foreclose on the property, all of which are costly.  Mr. Smith is notified and his property foreclosed upon of which is taken back by the bank to sell as an REO.</p>
<p>Six months later, the bank finally sells Mr. Smith’s home only they sell it for $90,000 (60% of current market value according to Realty Trac Foreclosure report dated 5/26/2011). Remember, as a short sale, the home would have sold for $120,000 keeping the deficiency to $100,000. In addition to the deficiency now being $130,000, the bank has elected to add on legal costs of $15,000 and asset preservation costs of another $5000 for a total deficiency liability of $150,000. Mr. Smith pulls his credit report 30 days after being notified that the bank has sold his property and of his liability.</p>
<p>On the report he notices that the mortgage trade line states “Foreclosure” and the balance is $150,000. Because of Mr Smith’s choice to choose foreclosure vs. short sale his road to financial recovery has taken a major detour. He not only has a foreclosure on his credit report but know has a much larger deficiency balance in which the bank, in most cases, will report on his credit report as a balance owed.</p>
<p>The Best Option is clear</p>
<p>While the financial and credit advantages are clear when choosing a short sale over a foreclosure, other advantages are sometimes overlooked. The most important of all of them is maintaining the seller’s dignity and peace of mind.  We have heard too many stories of families having to leave their homes because of a Sheriffs order or some other type of legal action. The short sale process alleviates this negative social impact. The process puts the control back in the seller’s hands so that they can get back on the road to financial recovery and start providing for their families.  In the battle of the two evils, a short sale always wins!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/10/%e2%80%9cwhy-should-a-seller-go-through-the-short-sale-process-rather-than-letting-their-house-be-foreclosed-upon%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FHFA sues 17 firms to recover losses to GSEs</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/09/fhfa-sues-17-firms-to-recover-losses-to-gses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/09/fhfa-sues-17-firms-to-recover-losses-to-gses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 03:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bendat, PSC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bob Bendat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Team Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Market News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yorba Linda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbendat.com/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), as conservator for Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has filed lawsuits against 17 financial institutions, certain of their officers and various unaffiliated lead underwriters. The suits allege violations of federal securities laws and common law in the sale of residential private-label mortgage-backed securities (PLS) to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), as conservator for Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has filed lawsuits against 17 financial institutions, certain of their officers and various unaffiliated lead underwriters. The suits allege violations of federal securities laws and common law in the sale of residential private-label mortgage-backed securities (PLS) to the GSEs</strong></p>
<p>Complaints have been filed against the following lead defendants, in alphabetical order:<br />
1. Ally Financial Inc. f/k/a GMAC, LLC<br />
2. Bank of America Corporation<br />
3. Barclays Bank PLC<br />
4. Citigroup, Inc.<br />
5. Countrywide Financial Corporation<br />
6. Credit Suisse Holdings (USA), Inc.<br />
7. Deutsche Bank AG<br />
8. First Horizon National Corporation<br />
9. General Electric Company<br />
10. Goldman Sachs &amp; Co.<br />
11. HSBC North America Holdings, Inc.<br />
12. JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.<br />
13. Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. / First Franklin Financial Corp.<br />
14. Morgan Stanley<br />
15. Nomura Holding America Inc.<br />
16. The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC<br />
17. Société Générale</p>
<p>The complaints seek damages and civil penalties under the Securities Act of 1933. In addition, each complaint seeks compensatory damages for negligent misrepresentation.</p>
<p><em><strong>Certain complaints also allege state securities law violations or common law fraud.</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bobbendat.com/2011/09/fhfa-sues-17-firms-to-recover-losses-to-gses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

