Bob Bendat
  • Information of Interest
  • December20th

    No Comments

    DEAR BENNY: Seven years ago, when my mother was 80, my husband and I
    purchased cooperative apartment shares in a senior complex for her to live in.
    Since at least one of the tenants had to be over 55, we put her name on the
    shares, as well as my name. The actual paperwork reads: ” ‘My Mother’s Name’ or
    ‘My Name’ as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in
    common.”

    If my mother needs to move to assisted living or a nursing home,
    will Medicaid try to get possession of this apartment? I’ve called the co-op’s
    attorney, senior law offices here in Reno, Nev., and I’ve called private
    attorneys. No one can give me an answer.

    One office suggested I call the Medicaid office. As much as I would like to, I think that might give Medicaid an
    opportunity to take what isn’t hers. We used equity in our home to purchase this
    apartment. My mom lives on Social Security and could never afford this
    apartment.

    One lawyer suggested the co-op “reconvey” the share back to my
    name, but their bylaws require that whoever is on the deed live
    there.

    Any ideas? Are we safe in keeping this, selling it and keeping the
    monies, or will Medicaid take it? –Penny

    DEAR PENNY: This is a
    complicated question and I am surprised that the senior law offices were unable
    to assist. There are a number of “elder lawyers” throughout the country, and you
    can locate them on the Web. I searched “elder lawyers” and found a number of Web
    sites that should be of assistance to you.

    Generally, however, Medicaid (which is administered by the state, with each state having its own rules) does
    not “get possession” of property. But if your mother applies for Medicaid, I
    assume she will need to disclose her interest in the co-op as an
    asset.

    It is possible that the state will take into account the fact that
    she is not an “equitable” owner of the property (as she did not contribute to
    the purchase price of the property) and simply disregard the asset. But even if
    she is considered to be an owner for Medicaid purposes, the state may impose
    only a lien on the property rather than require it be sold.

    In fact, if the state considers the co-op interest an asset of your mother, it wouldn’t
    require her to sell it, but could deny her benefits until her assets, including
    her interest in the house, were spent down to whatever the threshold is in
    Nevada.

    Many states allow a number of exceptions. For example, if a
    disabled family member (or a spouse, which I assume there is none) is living in
    the property, the Medicaid applicant would qualify for benefits and a lien would
    be imposed on the applicant’s share of the property in the amount of any
    benefits paid — but the benefits would need to be reimbursed when the property
    is sold or the disabled person or spouse dies.

    This is a highly specialized area of law, and not all attorneys understand the rules or the law.

    DEAR BENNY: I have a question about escrows for taxes and
    insurance. Let’s say I am buying a home and last year’s tax bill was $1,200 (or
    $100 per month). Can the lender set up escrow collecting $150 per month for
    taxes? –Nate

    DEAR NATE: My mathematical skills are limited, but the
    answer to your question is no. According to the federal Real Estate Settlement
    Procedures Act (commonly known as RESPA), a lender who collects money in escrow
    for real estate taxes and insurance can have only a two months’ cushion on an
    annual basis.

    So, if the bank is collecting $150 per month, annually that
    comes to $1,800. A two-month cushion allows you to collect only $1,400, or
    $116.66 per month.

    But depending on when settlement takes place, the
    lender does have the right to collect sufficient funds (plus two months extra)
    to make sure that it can pay the taxes and insurance when they become
    due.

    Let’s take this example: You settle (go to escrow) on May 15. The
    tax bill in your jurisdiction must be paid by Sept. 30, 2010, but is applied
    from January 2010 through December 2010. Because mortgage interest is calculated
    in arrears, your first payment will due in July. (Note: The lender will charge
    you interest at closing from May 15 to the end of that month.)

    By the time the real estate tax bill has to be paid, you will have made three payments
    in escrow (July, August and September). But the lender needs a full 12-month
    payment. Accordingly, the lender has the right to charge you — at closing –
    nine months’ escrow to collect all the money needed, plus two months’ cushion;
    in other words, the lender can charge you at closing for 11 months’
    escrow.

    Here’s a consumer protection suggestion: Because too many lenders
    often do not make the tax or insurance payments on a timely basis — or in some
    cases do not make the payments at all — homeowners should send their lender a
    demand letter, once a year right after the taxes or insurance payments are due,
    requesting proof that those payments have, in fact, been made.

    For those
    jurisdictions where this information can be found online, you should learn how
    to access this from your local government’s Web site.

    Benny L. Kass is
    a practicing attorney in Washington, D.C., and Maryland. No legal relationship
    is created by this column.

  • December20th

    No Comments

    After mustering the emotional energy to make an offer on a listing, it can be devastating if you hear nothing back from the seller. In most cases, if the offer isn’t what the sellers are looking for, they will issue a counteroffer detailing the price and terms they can live with. When a seller doesn’t respond at all to your offer, it’s usually because the offer is so low that the seller thinks it’s a waste of everyone’s time. Ask your agent to talk to the listing agent to find out why the seller didn’t counter your offer. Then, make another offer if you think the house warrants a higher price. If the sellers want too much for their house, take a breather. Let the listing sit on the market awhile before you make another offer. The risk of this approach is that another buyer could come into the picture who is willing to pay the sellers’ price. Nothing is lost if you wouldn’t have paid that price. Your agent should keep in touch with the listing agent during your wait-and-see period. Ideally, you’d like to know if the sellers are going to reduce the price before it shows up on the multiple listing service. A price reduction to market value could elicit interest from multiple buyers.
    Risk-averse sellers can be skittish about working with buyers who have a low cash downpayment. It’s wise to include a mortgage preapproval letter with your offer. Also, some sellers aren’t in a position to accept an offer that’s contingent on the sale of the buyers’ home. Another reason buyers don’t receive counteroffers is because there were multiple offers. The sellers can accept only one offer in primary position. If there were five offers and yours was the lowest, you’re not likely to receive a counteroffer. Multiple offers are occurring in low-inventory, high-demand
    markets. Buyers were out early this year due to lower home prices, low interest rates and homebuyer tax credits.
    HOUSE HUNTING: A typical reaction from buyers who lose in a multiple-offer competition is that they would have paid more. When you’re competing against other buyers, you need to make your first offer your best offer. This seems counterintuitive because you run the risk of
    paying more than you might need to. One way to ensure that you don’t pay too much is to include an appraisal contingency in your purchase offer. Generally, an appraisal contingency allows the buyers to withdraw from the contract if the house doesn’t appraise for the purchase price. In today’s wary lending environment, lenders are requiring appraisers to be conservative on appraisals, particularly in declining markets.
    Be aware that some buyers in a competitive situation will not include an appraisal contingency in their contract. If they have a large enough cash downpayment and the appraisal value is less that the contract price, the lender may still approve a loan amount that will enable to the buyer to proceed with the sale.
    THE CLOSING: Buyers who want a house badly enough will often pay more than the appraised value if they have enough cash to make up the shortfall.

  • December8th

    No Comments

    According to a survey by Trulia, the biggest barrier to buying a home these days is saving for the down payment. The survey, conducted over the summer, found that 51 percent of renters said coming up with money for the down payment was preventing them from buying, while 35 percent identified qualifying for a mortgage as the stumbling block.

    Under federal tax law, each individual is permitted to give money or valuables worth up to $13,000 to a single recipient in a calendar year. A married couple could jointly bestow up to $26,000 a year per recipient.

    According to one financial planner, there also is the option of lending a relative or close friend the money for the down payment, or the closing costs, then forgiving the loan in a future year. The recipient would have to pay interest on the loan until it was forgiven, at which point it would become a gift.

    Another way to help with the down payment is to pay other expenses, such as tuition, thereby freeing up money to make a home purchase. Gifts for educational or medical expenses are not subject to taxes, as long as they are paid directly to the educational or medical institution.

    However, prior to giving the money, gift-givers should consider their own financial picture, and they should make sure the recipient is responsible and not behind on other payments that could be subject to debt collection.

  • December8th

    No Comments
    by KERRI PANCHUK

     

  • October4th

    No Comments

    Today’s ever changing real estate industry has brought upon some very challenging questions. I want to put forth the best, non-emotional advice that I can, in hopes that I can help families navigate the rough waters of the short sale process.

    The most prevalent question and one that continues to permeate the industry is:

    “Why should a seller go through the short sale process rather than letting their house be foreclosed upon?”

    While we cannot speak to every client circumstance, we can say one thing with complete conviction.  In almost all instances in which a potential seller is contemplating whether they should short sell their house or let it go through the foreclosure process, a short sale is the better option. The following are examples to consider:

    Example A- Short Sale

    Mr. Smith owns a home in which he has a mortgage balance of $220,000 and a current market value of $150,000. Mr. Smith has elected to short sell his property. His Realtor successfully obtains a buyer who puts forth an offer price of $120,000 (80% current market value according to Realty Trac Foreclosure Report 5/26/2011). After reviewing the buyers offer and the financial hardship information from Mr. Smith, Mr Smith’s bank agrees to accept the short payoff of $120,000 which would leave a deficiency balance of $100,000.

    The transaction closes and is final.  Mr. Smith then pulls his credit report 30 days after the transaction takes place. On the report he notices that the mortgage trade line states “Mortgage debt was settled for less than full” and the balance on the mortgage is $0.  Mr. Smith is now on the road to financial recovery.

    Example B- Foreclosure

    For the ease of illustration we will use the same value and mortgage debt amounts as in Example A. However, Mr. Smith has elected to forgo the short sale process and let the bank foreclose on the property.  The bank holding his mortgage facilitates the proper legal procedures to foreclose on the property, all of which are costly.  Mr. Smith is notified and his property foreclosed upon of which is taken back by the bank to sell as an REO.

    Six months later, the bank finally sells Mr. Smith’s home only they sell it for $90,000 (60% of current market value according to Realty Trac Foreclosure report dated 5/26/2011). Remember, as a short sale, the home would have sold for $120,000 keeping the deficiency to $100,000. In addition to the deficiency now being $130,000, the bank has elected to add on legal costs of $15,000 and asset preservation costs of another $5000 for a total deficiency liability of $150,000. Mr. Smith pulls his credit report 30 days after being notified that the bank has sold his property and of his liability.

    On the report he notices that the mortgage trade line states “Foreclosure” and the balance is $150,000. Because of Mr Smith’s choice to choose foreclosure vs. short sale his road to financial recovery has taken a major detour. He not only has a foreclosure on his credit report but know has a much larger deficiency balance in which the bank, in most cases, will report on his credit report as a balance owed.

    The Best Option is clear

    While the financial and credit advantages are clear when choosing a short sale over a foreclosure, other advantages are sometimes overlooked. The most important of all of them is maintaining the seller’s dignity and peace of mind.  We have heard too many stories of families having to leave their homes because of a Sheriffs order or some other type of legal action. The short sale process alleviates this negative social impact. The process puts the control back in the seller’s hands so that they can get back on the road to financial recovery and start providing for their families.  In the battle of the two evils, a short sale always wins!!!