Bob Bendat
  • Economic News
  • December20th

    No Comments

    DEAR BENNY: Seven years ago, when my mother was 80, my husband and I
    purchased cooperative apartment shares in a senior complex for her to live in.
    Since at least one of the tenants had to be over 55, we put her name on the
    shares, as well as my name. The actual paperwork reads: ” ‘My Mother’s Name’ or
    ‘My Name’ as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in
    common.”

    If my mother needs to move to assisted living or a nursing home,
    will Medicaid try to get possession of this apartment? I’ve called the co-op’s
    attorney, senior law offices here in Reno, Nev., and I’ve called private
    attorneys. No one can give me an answer.

    One office suggested I call the Medicaid office. As much as I would like to, I think that might give Medicaid an
    opportunity to take what isn’t hers. We used equity in our home to purchase this
    apartment. My mom lives on Social Security and could never afford this
    apartment.

    One lawyer suggested the co-op “reconvey” the share back to my
    name, but their bylaws require that whoever is on the deed live
    there.

    Any ideas? Are we safe in keeping this, selling it and keeping the
    monies, or will Medicaid take it? –Penny

    DEAR PENNY: This is a
    complicated question and I am surprised that the senior law offices were unable
    to assist. There are a number of “elder lawyers” throughout the country, and you
    can locate them on the Web. I searched “elder lawyers” and found a number of Web
    sites that should be of assistance to you.

    Generally, however, Medicaid (which is administered by the state, with each state having its own rules) does
    not “get possession” of property. But if your mother applies for Medicaid, I
    assume she will need to disclose her interest in the co-op as an
    asset.

    It is possible that the state will take into account the fact that
    she is not an “equitable” owner of the property (as she did not contribute to
    the purchase price of the property) and simply disregard the asset. But even if
    she is considered to be an owner for Medicaid purposes, the state may impose
    only a lien on the property rather than require it be sold.

    In fact, if the state considers the co-op interest an asset of your mother, it wouldn’t
    require her to sell it, but could deny her benefits until her assets, including
    her interest in the house, were spent down to whatever the threshold is in
    Nevada.

    Many states allow a number of exceptions. For example, if a
    disabled family member (or a spouse, which I assume there is none) is living in
    the property, the Medicaid applicant would qualify for benefits and a lien would
    be imposed on the applicant’s share of the property in the amount of any
    benefits paid — but the benefits would need to be reimbursed when the property
    is sold or the disabled person or spouse dies.

    This is a highly specialized area of law, and not all attorneys understand the rules or the law.

    DEAR BENNY: I have a question about escrows for taxes and
    insurance. Let’s say I am buying a home and last year’s tax bill was $1,200 (or
    $100 per month). Can the lender set up escrow collecting $150 per month for
    taxes? –Nate

    DEAR NATE: My mathematical skills are limited, but the
    answer to your question is no. According to the federal Real Estate Settlement
    Procedures Act (commonly known as RESPA), a lender who collects money in escrow
    for real estate taxes and insurance can have only a two months’ cushion on an
    annual basis.

    So, if the bank is collecting $150 per month, annually that
    comes to $1,800. A two-month cushion allows you to collect only $1,400, or
    $116.66 per month.

    But depending on when settlement takes place, the
    lender does have the right to collect sufficient funds (plus two months extra)
    to make sure that it can pay the taxes and insurance when they become
    due.

    Let’s take this example: You settle (go to escrow) on May 15. The
    tax bill in your jurisdiction must be paid by Sept. 30, 2010, but is applied
    from January 2010 through December 2010. Because mortgage interest is calculated
    in arrears, your first payment will due in July. (Note: The lender will charge
    you interest at closing from May 15 to the end of that month.)

    By the time the real estate tax bill has to be paid, you will have made three payments
    in escrow (July, August and September). But the lender needs a full 12-month
    payment. Accordingly, the lender has the right to charge you — at closing –
    nine months’ escrow to collect all the money needed, plus two months’ cushion;
    in other words, the lender can charge you at closing for 11 months’
    escrow.

    Here’s a consumer protection suggestion: Because too many lenders
    often do not make the tax or insurance payments on a timely basis — or in some
    cases do not make the payments at all — homeowners should send their lender a
    demand letter, once a year right after the taxes or insurance payments are due,
    requesting proof that those payments have, in fact, been made.

    For those
    jurisdictions where this information can be found online, you should learn how
    to access this from your local government’s Web site.

    Benny L. Kass is
    a practicing attorney in Washington, D.C., and Maryland. No legal relationship
    is created by this column.

  • December8th

    No Comments

    According to a survey by Trulia, the biggest barrier to buying a home these days is saving for the down payment. The survey, conducted over the summer, found that 51 percent of renters said coming up with money for the down payment was preventing them from buying, while 35 percent identified qualifying for a mortgage as the stumbling block.

    Under federal tax law, each individual is permitted to give money or valuables worth up to $13,000 to a single recipient in a calendar year. A married couple could jointly bestow up to $26,000 a year per recipient.

    According to one financial planner, there also is the option of lending a relative or close friend the money for the down payment, or the closing costs, then forgiving the loan in a future year. The recipient would have to pay interest on the loan until it was forgiven, at which point it would become a gift.

    Another way to help with the down payment is to pay other expenses, such as tuition, thereby freeing up money to make a home purchase. Gifts for educational or medical expenses are not subject to taxes, as long as they are paid directly to the educational or medical institution.

    However, prior to giving the money, gift-givers should consider their own financial picture, and they should make sure the recipient is responsible and not behind on other payments that could be subject to debt collection.

  • December8th

    No Comments
    by KERRI PANCHUK

     

  • September7th

    No Comments

    The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), as conservator for Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has filed lawsuits against 17 financial institutions, certain of their officers and various unaffiliated lead underwriters. The suits allege violations of federal securities laws and common law in the sale of residential private-label mortgage-backed securities (PLS) to the GSEs

    Complaints have been filed against the following lead defendants, in alphabetical order:
    1. Ally Financial Inc. f/k/a GMAC, LLC
    2. Bank of America Corporation
    3. Barclays Bank PLC
    4. Citigroup, Inc.
    5. Countrywide Financial Corporation
    6. Credit Suisse Holdings (USA), Inc.
    7. Deutsche Bank AG
    8. First Horizon National Corporation
    9. General Electric Company
    10. Goldman Sachs & Co.
    11. HSBC North America Holdings, Inc.
    12. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
    13. Merrill Lynch & Co. / First Franklin Financial Corp.
    14. Morgan Stanley
    15. Nomura Holding America Inc.
    16. The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC
    17. Société Générale

    The complaints seek damages and civil penalties under the Securities Act of 1933. In addition, each complaint seeks compensatory damages for negligent misrepresentation.

    Certain complaints also allege state securities law violations or common law fraud.

  • June6th

    No Comments

    Forex – CoreLogic: Home Price Index increased 0.7% between March and April
    By: Calculated Risk on June 1 11 1:55 EDT
    Notes: Case-Shiller is the most followed house price index, but CoreLogic is used by the Federal Reserve and is followed by many analysts. The CoreLogic HPI is a three month weighted average of February, March, and April (April weighted the most) and is not seasonally adjusted (NSA).

    From CoreLogic: CoreLogic® Home Price Index Shows First Month-over-Month Increase since mid-2010

    CoreLogic … today released its April Home Price Index (HPI) which shows that home prices in the U.S. increased on a month-to-month basis by 0.7 percent between March and April, 2011, the first such increase since the home-buyer tax credit expired in mid-2010. However, national home prices, including distressed sales, declined by 7.5 percent in April 2011 compared to April 2010 after declining by 6.8 per cent in March 2011 compared to March 2010. Excluding distressed sales, year-over-year prices declined by 0.5 percent in April 2011 compared to April 2010.

    “While the economic recovery is still fragile and one data point is not a trend, the month-over-month increase based on April sales activity is a positive sign. …” said Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic.
    I was expecting the CoreLogic index to increase over the summer because it is not seasonally adjusted, however the seasonal increases usually start in June (when the Spring home purchases start to closes). This is just one data point, but it is possible this index will have small increases all summer.

    I’ll have more later (and hopefully a graph).

    ——————————————————————————–